On Thu, Apr 07 2022, Derrick Stolee wrote: > On 3/8/2022 12:15 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote: >> On 3/4/2022 10:12 AM, Derrick Stolee wrote: >>> On 3/4/2022 9:49 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >>>> Also, as noted in the upthread >>>> <220224.86czjdb22l.gmgdl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> it might be useful to chat >>>> in a more voice/video medium in parallel (maybe mid-next-week) about the >>>> high-level ideas & to get a feel for our goals, conflicts etc. Doing >>>> that over very long E-Mail exchanges (and the fault of "long" there is >>>> mostly on my side:) can be a bit harder... >>> >>> I agree. I we can work out a time in a private thread and I can send >>> you a video call invite. >> >> Ævar and I just finished our chat and came away with these two >> action items: >> >> 1. Ævar will finish prepping his RFC as-is and send it to the list. >> It contains several deeply technical optimizations that are >> critical to how his model works, but could also be used to >> improve scenarios in the table of contents model. > > Ævar: I'm still waiting on the full version of this. While you > updated [1] your original RFC [2], it was incomplete. I am still > looking forward to seeing your full vision of how it works with > incremental fetch and how your optimizations to download only the > headers of the bundles will work. > > [1] [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] bundle-uri: a "dumb CDN" for git > https://lore.kernel.org/git/RFC-cover-v2-00.13-00000000000-20220311T155841Z-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/ > > [2] [RFC PATCH 00/13] Add bundle-uri: resumably clones, static "dumb" CDN etc. > https://lore.kernel.org/git/RFC-cover-00.13-0000000000-20210805T150534Z-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/ > >> 2. Ævar will then do a round of taking both series and combining >> them in a way that allows the union of possible functionality >> to work. > > Or perhaps you are jumping straight to this part? Yeah, that was part of it... >> 3. As these things come out, I will make it a priority to read the >> patches and provide feedback focusing on high-level concepts >> and ways we can split the future, non-RFC series into chunks >> that provide incremental functionality while keeping review >> easier than reading the whole series. > > I'm still looking forward to seeing progress in this area. Please > let me know what your plan is here. Hi. I'm sorry about the delay, I ran into various life/software things, and found that this topic required a lot of continuous "sit down for a day and work on it" attention from me v.s. some other topics where I'd deal with interruption better. Then I was hoping that the merger of your bundle.c changes would come a bit earlier before the rc, but they pretty much coincided, and since the rc dropped I've been hesitant to send a very large topic to the list (c.f. e.g. [1]). Maybe I should just bite the bullet and submit it anyway, what do you think? 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2204071407160.347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
