Hi, On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > Can we make "amend" like squash, except that it keeps the first > > > commit's authorship instead of the second? I often merge a commit > > > with some minor fix that comes later, and usually want to keep the > > > original author record. Thinking about this again... Maybe it is a better semantics anyway? What do others think? Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html