Hi, On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Avi Kivity wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > When you do many rebases, you can get annoyed by having to type out > > the actions "edit" or "squash" in total. > > > > This commit helps that, by allowing you to enter "e" instead of > > "edit", or "s" instead of "squash", and it also plays nice with > > "merge" or "amend" as synonyms to "squash". > > Can we make "amend" like squash, except that it keeps the first commit's > authorship instead of the second? I often merge a commit with some > minor fix that comes later, and usually want to keep the original author > record. I do not necessarily think it is not doable, but I have different suggestion to you: If you amend the commit with a minor fix that comes later, why not do "rebase -i" _before_ applying the fix, and then using "edit" on the respective commit? That way you can even test the result easily, which you cannot do with "squash". Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
