On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:02 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Desmond Preston <despreston@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> The fact that this line was introduced in [PATCH 1/2] and then
> >> needed to immediately be corrected with this patch means the
> >> previous patch was suboptimal and this patch is "oops, the last one
> >> was bad and here is a band-aid fix-up".
> >>
> >> Let's not do so. Instead, you are encouraged to pretend to be a
> >> more perfect developer who does not make unnecessary mistake ;-)
>
> FYI, I've queued [1/2] with the fix-up in [2/2] squashed in.
>
> N_("git worktree remove [<options>] <worktree>"),
> + N_("git worktree repair [<path>...]"),
> N_("git worktree unlock <path>"),
This version looks good to me and addresses my review comments[*], and
still has my Acked-by: for what it's worth.
Thanks for putting the finishing touches on this.
[*]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/3f823608-adf4-f717-13d8-8da6f89a9506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
