"Des Preston via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Des Preston <despreston@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Update the worktree usage to show that the repair command can take
> multiple paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Des Preston <despreston@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> builtin/worktree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
> index 8682ff4c417..498975c1fd9 100644
> --- a/builtin/worktree.c
> +++ b/builtin/worktree.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static const char * const worktree_usage[] = {
> N_("git worktree move <worktree> <new-path>"),
> N_("git worktree prune [<options>]"),
> N_("git worktree remove [<options>] <worktree>"),
> - N_("git worktree repair [<path>]"),
> + N_("git worktree repair [<path>...]"),
The fact that this line was introduced in [PATCH 1/2] and then
needed to immediately be corrected with this patch means the
previous patch was suboptimal and this patch is "oops, the last one
was bad and here is a band-aid fix-up".
Let's not do so. Instead, you are encouraged to pretend to be a
more perfect developer who does not make unnecessary mistake ;-)
