Am 28.03.22 um 14:16 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason: > On Mon, Mar 28 2022, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> What is wrong with >> the status quo? > > The larger context for why I was looking at this again is that I'm > trying to slowly get us to the point where we can remove the > i18n-in-shellscript entirtely. Why? Again: what is wrong with the status quo? > Just like having that "USE_PIC" comment in configure.ac isn't much of a > big deal, but it makes sense to clean up unused code, just as we're > adding new code. There is a difference between "clean up unused code" and "change observable behavior". -- Hannes