Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Under this schema, 'default' isn't useful as an aggregate option, so
> I'll eliminate
> that.

Yeah, the only difference is the starting point.  Either start with
default set of bits and give an option to clear, or start with an
empty set and give an option to set default.  The former may be a
bit less cumbersome to users but there isn't a huge difference.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux