Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > At the conclusion of this series, I defined 'default' as an aggregate >> > option that includes >> > the platform default. I'd prefer not to have any statefulness of the >> > core.fsync setting so >> > that there is less confusion about the final fsync configuration. >> >> Then scratch your preference ;-) > > Just to clarify, linguistically, by 'scratch' do you mean that I should drop > my preference Yes. > Is there a well-defined place where we know that configuration processing > is complete? The most obvious spot to me to integrate these two values would > be the first time we need to figure out the fsync state. That sounds like a good place.
