Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Looking more closely that should be "break" not "return 0". I think
> what has happened is that I accidentally based these on an old version
> of pw/single-key-interactive which did not contain 24d7ce383a
> ("terminal: always reset terminal when reading without echo",
> 2022-02-22)
I thought the base pw/single-key-interactive topic is solid enough
and ready for 'next'? It probably is a good idea to rebase these
follow-on patches on top of a merge of the base topic into 'master'.
I'll keep v2 in 'seen' but mark the topic as "Expecting a reroll"
in the draft of the next issue of the "What's cooking" report.
Thanks.
