Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] fetch: fetch unpopulated, changed submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Or am I oversimplifying the problem?
>
> I don't think you are oversimplifying. Now that I look at it again, it
> really _does_ seem trivial. Doing this refactor saves me the headache of
> explaining why we need a single <.super_oid, .path> tuple, and saves
> readers the headache of figuring out if I'm right.
>
> I'll try it and see if it really makes things simpler or not.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux