On 07/03/2022 20:43, Junio C Hamano wrote: > It would have been better if you culled the parts of the patch you > are not referring to, by the way. Oops sorry, I'm not that great at deciding which parts to keep/cull to ensure sufficient context for other readers - it wasn't something that was desired when I was working (too many 'Outlook' influences). I'll work on it. Philip