Hi, On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Abhradeep Chakraborty wrote: > Junio C Hamano <<gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yup, if we can have static and dynamic checks of the same quality, > > static checks are always better alternative. In this case, runtime > > check would probably be an expedite solution suitable for a shorter > > term to fill the gap, as a static check with the same quality as it > > would probably need some time to develop. > > Got it! While the runtime check would address the concern in the short run, paving the path for future static checks revolving around the same area will pay off quite happily. > > I do not have any particular interest. If it is a tool fit for the > > task, it would be good to use it, that's all ;-) > > Okay, then I would like to research if that is a good fit. Johannes > is pretty confident about it though. Yes, he is. And he wishes he had the time to work on it himself because it sounds like a really fun (if challenging) project. In other words: If you ever get stuck somewhere along the lines, please do push up a work-in-progress branch and reach out here so that I or others can help. Ciao, Dscho
