Junio C Hamano <<gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yup, if we can have static and dynamic checks of the same quality, > static checks are always better alternative. In this case, runtime > check would probably be an expedite solution suitable for a shorter > term to fill the gap, as a static check with the same quality as it > would probably need some time to develop. Got it! > I do not have any particular interest. If it is a tool fit for the > task, it would be good to use it, that's all ;-) Okay, then I would like to research if that is a good fit. Johannes is pretty confident about it though. Thanks :)
