Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] t5526: stop asserting on stderr literally

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The check_ names still aren't changed (as I suggested in [1]) but
>> perhaps it's fine to leave it. It doesn't seem to bother the other
>> reviewers, and changing it would slightly disrupt the review in that
>> there will be extra changes in the range-diff.
>
> At least, please do not count my not mentioning it as such a vote.
> I didn't mention it because I saw you did.

Oh! Sorry, I intended to do this - I missed this and another suggestion
that you made re: test assertions [1]. Will incorporate this into the
next round.

[1] 20220304234622.647776-1-jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux