Re: [PATCH 00/15] tests: don't ignore "git" exit codes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 03 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Yes, it returns the correct status code, but that doesn't help with
>> (pseudo)code like:
>>
>> 	if (run_command("foo")) /* exits with e.g. 123 */
>> 		die("oh no, foo failed"); /* exits with 128 */
>>
>> I should have said "code using run-command.c does not do that...",
>> sorry.
>
> Yeah, but even if callers of run_command() can tell "foo"
> segfaulted, I do not think it is sensible to exit as if we
> segfaulted (or, we _could_ actually die by segfaulting ourselves,
> which is worse).

I should have made it clear that I'm thinking about this as a test-only
mode, so hidden behind some GIT_TEST_* variable, i.e. as a means to an
end in getting the test suite to spot the failure in the sub-process.

It's not the only way to do it, but it's the simplest and most reliable
given how our tests are run.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux