Hi Ævar, On Mon, 21 Feb 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20 2022, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > I notice that you did not take this into `seen` yet. I find that a little > >> > sad because it would potentially have helped others to figure out the > >> > failure in the latest `seen`: > >> > https://github.com/git/git/runs/5255378056?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:162 > >> > > >> > Essentially, a recent patch introduces hard-coded SHA-1 hashes in t3007.3. > >> > >> I saw the thread, I saw a few patches were commented on, and a few > >> were left unanswered, but one was replied by the original submitter > >> with a "Good catch!", making me expect the topic to be discussed or > >> rerolled to become ready relatively soon. > > > > Yes, I have local changes, but I had really hoped that this patch series > > would get a chance to prove its point by example, i.e. by offering the > > improved output for the failures in `seen`. I hoped that because I think > > that those improvements speak for themselves when you see them. > > I think it's a good idea to get wider expose in "seen", "next" etc. for > topics where the bottleneck is lack of feedback due to lack of wider > exposure. Having this in `seen` will give the patch series a chance to show in real life how it improves the process of analyzing regressions. Ciao, Johannes
