Hi Junio, On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > I notice that you did not take this into `seen` yet. I find that a little > > sad because it would potentially have helped others to figure out the > > failure in the latest `seen`: > > https://github.com/git/git/runs/5255378056?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:162 > > > > Essentially, a recent patch introduces hard-coded SHA-1 hashes in t3007.3. > > I saw the thread, I saw a few patches were commented on, and a few > were left unanswered, but one was replied by the original submitter > with a "Good catch!", making me expect the topic to be discussed or > rerolled to become ready relatively soon. Yes, I have local changes, but I had really hoped that this patch series would get a chance to prove its point by example, i.e. by offering the improved output for the failures in `seen`. I hoped that because I think that those improvements speak for themselves when you see them. Ciao, Dscho
