Re: [PATCH 4/7] reftable: avoid writing empty keys at the block layer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 2:26 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +     ref.refname = "";
> > +     ref.value_type = REFTABLE_REF_DELETION;
> > +     n = block_writer_add(&bw, &rec);
> > +     EXPECT(n == REFTABLE_API_ERROR);
> > +
>
> The preimage of this hunk has been invalidated by your 9c498398
> (reftable: make reftable_record a tagged union, 2021-12-22).
>
> I see that the hn/reftable-coverity-fixes topic, which the commit is
> a part of, has been expecting a reroll since last year---are you

I sent a reroll on Jan 12. As that has had more scrutiny, it's best if
that lands first. This series is less urgent.

> plannning to rebuild that series after landing this series first?

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--

Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux