Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] sparse-checkout: limit tab completion to a single level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/12/22 6:38 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:43 PM Lessley Dennington
<lessleydennington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+__gitcomp_directories ()
+{
+     local _tmp_dir _tmp_completions
+
+     # Get the directory of the current token; this differs from dirname
+     # in that it keeps up to the final trailing slash.  If no slash found
+     # that's fine too.
+     [[ "$cur" =~ .*/ ]]
+     _tmp_dir=$BASH_REMATCH
+
+     # Find possible directory completions, adding trailing '/' characters
+     _tmp_completions="$(git ls-tree -d --name-only HEAD $_tmp_dir |
+         sed -e s%$%/%)"
+
I am admittedly unfamiliar with the use of this format in sed expressions
(I'm generally more accustomed to '/' instead of '%'). It's definitely
working as it should, I'm just not quite sure of how.

These are the same in sed:
    sed -e s/apple/banana/
    sed -e s@apple@banana@
    sed -e s%apple%banana%

You can pick any character you like, but '/' is what people most often
use.  My expression involved a '/', though, so I changed the delimiter
to avoid ugly backslash escapes.

Got it, thanks!
+     if [[ -n "$_tmp_completions" ]]; then
+         # There were some directory completions, so find ones that
+         # start with "$cur", the current token, and put those in COMPREPLY
+         local i=0 c IFS=$' \t\n'
Does c need to be declared before the loop?

It was, but it's super easy to miss.  Look at the "local" line just
before your comment; it almost reads like line noise, but basically
there are three variables declared with two of them given initial
values.  c is in the middle, without an initial value.

Sorry, I should have made my question clearer - I saw that c is declared
before the loop but was wondering if that was actually necessary. I
removed it locally and ran the tests, which seemed to work without it.
+         for c in $_tmp_completions; do
+             if [[ $c == "$cur"* ]]; then
+                 COMPREPLY+=("$c")
+             fi
+         done
+     elif [[ "$cur" =~ /$ ]]; then
+         # No possible further completions any deeper, so assume we're at
+         # a leaf directory and just consider it complete
Thank you so much for the detailed comments on this change - it made it
really easy to parse.
+         __gitcomp_direct_append "$cur "
What's the reason for the trailing space here?

The space was related to the "just consider it complete" aspect of the
comment above.  Anyway, to understand why the space character signals
the completion being final for this token, let's use some comparisons
with bash-completion of just a plain 'ls' command...

In git.git, at the toplevel, if I type
   ls README.md <TAB>
(note the space after README.md before pressing <TAB>), then
completion assumes I'm trying to get another term besides just
README.md, and can complete on anything in the directory.  In
contrast, if I type
    ls README.md<TAB>
(with no space between README.md and <TAB>), then completion figures
I'm trying to find filenames that start with "README.md", finds only
one, and returns "README.md " (note the trailing space).  That
trailing space makes my command line become "ls README.md " (again,
with a trailing space), so that if I try to do any more tab
completions, it's for adding another argument to the ls command, not
extending the README.md one.

You can see similar things with ls and directories.  For example, if you type
   ls Doc<TAB>tec<TAB>m<TAB>

then you'll note after the first <TAB> you'll see
   ls Documentation/
with no trailing space; after the second <TAB> you'll see
   ls Documentation/technical/
with no trailing space; and after the third <TAB> you'll see
   ls Documentation/technical/multi-pack-index.txt
WITH a trailing space.  In the first two cases, further completions
were possible so they didn't add a trailing space to signify the
completion was final, but in the third case it is final and needed the
trailing space to denote that.

Does that help?

Yes, very much! Thank you.
+     fi
+}

Added my review as mentioned in [1].

[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1108.v2.git.1640892413.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/T/#md3da435452988b0366ab4c2ee4bc06df2d17cb36



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux