Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This is a follow-up to the recently landed ab/refs-errno-cleanup > topic, I missed a spot and left some meaningless use of "errno" in the > refs (file) backend. Is it a fix "oops the ones we merged to 'master' were buggy and needs these on top to be correct"? If it is merely a follow-up "I am doing more of the same thing as we aimed to do in that topic", I'd rather leave it to the next cycle. I'll come back to the topic to find it out from the patches themselves, but after I dealt with other patches that are more clearly fix-ups first. Thanks.
