Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > >> Another short series for db/fetch-pack, still in pu. Aside from >> optimizing the pipeline on the native transport (so we only invoke >> the remote process we need once vs. twice) I'm actually now quite >> comfortable with this whole series and think it is ready for next. > > While it's still in pu, should these series of corrections be amended into > the original series (for the ones that correct new code)? Most of the > before-fixing states aren't worth saving as project history. Yeah, I was wondering if that is a sane thing to do. It is merely additional work to arrive at the same tree state, but might be a good investment in the longer term. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
