On Tuesday, 28 December 2021 08:01:30 CET Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 28.12.21 um 00:23 schrieb Jean-Noël Avila via GitGitGadget:
> > From: =?UTF-8?q?Jean-No=C3=ABl=20Avila?= <jn.avila@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@xxxxxxx>
>
> Two questions:
>
> - Is "%s requires %s" already used elsewhere or is it a new translatable
> string? The commit message should clarify the choice.
%s requires %s is a new translatable string. Will update.
>
> - Do translators know that the two %s will be substituted with options
> (mostly)?
Indeed this is not clear. So we should apply the same transformation as for "cannot be used together"
>
> > --- a/fetch-pack.c
> > +++ b/fetch-pack.c
> > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int find_common(struct fetch_negotiator *negotiator,
> > struct packet_reader reader;
> >
> > if (args->stateless_rpc && multi_ack == 1)
> > - die(_("--stateless-rpc requires multi_ack_detailed"));
> > + die(_("%s requires %s"), "--stateless-rpc", "multi_ack_detailed");
>
> Here, the second %s is not an option. I hope that does not invalidate
> any translation of the string.
True. So let's use "the option '%s' requires '%s'" instead.
>
> -- Hannes
>
