Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> v6 fixes v5's bad rebase; it was based off a merge commit in 'seen' >> instead of js/branch-track-inherit. Since v5 is mostly a no-op, I will >> also include a range-diff against v4, which is the last version that >> anyone except Junio would care about. >> >> This version is based off Josh's js/branch-track-inherit v7. Because that >> is not yet in 'seen',... > > Thanks. js/branch/track-inherit has been using v7 since Fri Dec 17 > 15:47:47 2021 -0800, but unfortunately that was after the week's > integration work and the 'seen' shown to the public probably did not > have it. > > FYI at least since [*1*] was used to create 751363af (branch: add > flags and config to inherit tracking, 2021-10-16), the topic > js/branch-track-inherit has always been queued on top of f443b226 > (Thirteenth batch, 2021-10-14). I try to keep the same base to keep > things stable, unless there is a strong enough reason why we should > depend on newer base commit. Ah, I see, so it would make the most sense for me to apply the patches on the the same base as you. I'll keep that in mind in the future.
