Hi, On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:18:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > I was wondering if that was to be expected for git-fsck to be > > > significantly slower than git-prune (by several orders of magnitude) ? > > > > fsck validates objects are correct and sane. prune only looks > > at reachability. > > Now, the speed difference makes sense, but I wouldn't expect lost-found > to actually bother validating objects... That's why we should get rid of lost-found, and only keep the --lost-found option to git-fsck, to make it clear. And I think that it is too rare that you lost objects and want to find them, to warrant a fast version of it. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
