Re: git-fsck/lost-found's speed vs git-prune's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:18:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I was wondering if that was to be expected for git-fsck to be
> > significantly slower than git-prune (by several orders of magnitude) ?
> 
> fsck validates objects are correct and sane.  prune only looks
> at reachability.

Now, the speed difference makes sense, but I wouldn't expect lost-found
to actually bother validating objects...

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux