Hi Junio, On Thu, 2 Dec 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > while I think CI testing would be nice once we have a functionally > > useful scalar, the CI tests of this early version aren't really > > netting us anything. And they're blocking future scalar series > > unnecessarily. Johannes already said he had planned CI testing for a > > future series, so I'd rather just take this version of js/scalar minus > > the CI integration for next.) > > Yeah, with less stomping on each others' toes, things may flow > smoother. I also would find it nice if that was the case. If I remember correctly, you mentioned quite a couple of times that you expect, particularly oldtimers on this list, to be mindful when contributing patch series, and to delay patches that would interfere with other patch series that are already in flight. I saw with sorrow that this rule was ignored a couple of times recently, even with new contributors, and I sincerely hope that we can unignore that rule again. > As long as people are happy with the core part, that sounds like the > best approach forward. Thank you. I have to admit that it was quite frustrating to see so many obstacles being put in my way, only to end up at pretty much the same place as I had been over a month ago. So it is extra gratifying to hear that you move forward with the Scalar patch series. I truly believe that our users will be better off for it. Thanks, Dscho
