Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] blame: enable and test the sparse index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/23/21 3:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Lessley Dennington via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:

diff --git a/builtin/blame.c b/builtin/blame.c
index 641523ff9af..247b9eaf88f 100644
--- a/builtin/blame.c
+++ b/builtin/blame.c
@@ -902,6 +902,11 @@ int cmd_blame(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
  	long anchor;
  	const int hexsz = the_hash_algo->hexsz;
+ if (startup_info->have_repository) {

The command is marked with RUN_SETUP bit in git.c::commands[] list,
so I would think we wouldn't even get called if we are not in a
repository here.

Under what condition can startup_info->have_repository be false at
this point in the control flow?  If there is such a case, it would
mean that startup_info->have_repository bit can be false even if we
are in a repository.  That sounds like a bug in some code (I do not
know where offhand) that is supposed to prepare the startup_info
before cmd_X() functions are called.

As with checkout and pack-objects, this was added to protect against
the new BUG() in prepare_repo_settings being triggered with the help
command (which was surfaced with failures in t0012-help.sh). As with
those builtins, I will be removing the conditional and moving
prepare_repo_settings after parse_options in v5.
diff --git a/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh b/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh
index 5cf94627383..9ac76a049b8 100755
--- a/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh
+++ b/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ test_perf_on_all git reset
  test_perf_on_all git reset --hard
  test_perf_on_all git reset -- does-not-exist
  test_perf_on_all git diff
-test_perf_on_all git diff --cached
+test_perf_on_all git diff --staged

That's a funny revert of what the previous step did; I thought this
step was about "blame" and not "diff".

+test_perf_on_all git blame $SPARSE_CONE/a
+test_perf_on_all git blame $SPARSE_CONE/f3/a
test_done
-# TODO: blame currently does not support blaming files outside of the
-# sparse definition. It complains that the file doesn't exist locally.
-test_expect_failure 'blame with pathspec outside sparse definition' '
+# NEEDSWORK: This test documents the current behavior, but this could
+# change in the future if we decide to support blaming files outside
+# the sparse definition.

OK.  From the description it is clear that we do not support it
right now, which is OK by me.

Elijah made the point that blaming files outside the directory isn't
supported in full checkouts either. So I've updated the comment and
commit description a bit for v5.

Lessley



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux