Re: [PATCH] revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for() loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 07:30, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There are certain C99 features that might be nice to use in our code
> base, but we've hesitated to do so in order to avoid breaking
> compatibility with older compilers. But we don't actually know if
> people are even using pre-C99 compilers these days.

> is a long-enough time, so let's try it agin.

s/agin/again/

>  void show_object_with_name(FILE *out, struct object *obj, const char *name)
>  {
> -       const char *p;
> -
>         fprintf(out, "%s ", oid_to_hex(&obj->oid));
> -       for (p = name; *p && *p != '\n'; p++)
> +       for (const char *p = name; *p && *p != '\n'; p++)
>                 fputc(*p, out);
>         fputc('\n', out);
>  }

This seems like a stable-enough function for this experiment.

Similar to 765dc16888 ("git-compat-util: always enable variadic macros",
2021-01-28), maybe we should add something like

  /*
   * This "for (const char *p = ..." is made as a first step towards
   * making use of such declarations elsewhere in our codebase.  If
   * it causes compilation problems on your platform, please report
   * it to the Git mailing list at git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
   */

to reduce the chance of someone patching it up locally thinking that
it's just a one-off.

Martin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux