Saksham Mittal <gotlouemail@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> It is declared, there is an "int i;" a few lines up. > > Oh, man, I never even saw that! The patch is completely unnecessary > then. Sorry for that! No need to say sorry; you'd want to be a bit more careful next time, that's all. Also, our code does not introduce a new variable in the first part of "for (;;)" loop control, so even if the original lacked decl for "i", the posted patch is not how we write our code for this project. Thanks.
