Re: Track /etc directory using Git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



also sprach Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007.09.15.1727 +0200]:
> > I think it doesn't get bloated until you try to support the model of
> > tracking different stuff for different files in the same repo. If
> > you just track one set of data across all files in the repo, I don't
> > think it'll cause too much bloat.
> 
>   Yeah but if the stuff is opaque to git, you'll definitely end up with
> security issues, which makes it also a no-go for /etc versionning.

With "opaque to git" do you mean "implemented outside git"?

I'd say if done properly inside git, the security issues could be
prevented.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@xxxxxxxxxx>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"this sentence contradicts itself -- no actually it doesn't."
                                                 -- douglas hofstadter

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux