Re: [PATCH 05/11] builtin/repack.c: avoid leaking child arguments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> `git repack` invokes a handful of child processes: one to write the
> actual pack, and optionally ones to repack promisor objects and update
> the MIDX.
>
> In none of these cases do we bother to call child_process_clear(), which
> frees the memory associated with each child's arguments and environment.
>
> In order to do so, tweak each function that spawns a child process to
> have a `cleanup` label that we always visit before returning from each
> function. Then, make sure that we call child_process_clear() as a part
> of that label.

I have a slight aversion against the fact that this patch makes us
call child_process_clear(), when we know we may have called
finish_command().  Callers of finish_command() in other codepaths
rely on the fact that finish_command() calls child_process_clear(),
which means that because of this change, we are now constrained to
keep child_process_clear() idempotent?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux