On 9/13/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> > index 4f7b7da..2c8a665 100755
> > --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> > +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> > @@ -1690,7 +1690,7 @@ sub git_get_references {
> > my %refs;
> > if (git_is_head_detached()) {
> > my $hash = git_get_head_hash($project);
> > - $refs{$hash} = [ 'HEAD' ];
> > + $refs{$hash} = [ 'detached/HEAD' ];
> > }
> > # 5dc01c595e6c6ec9ccda4f6f69c131c0dd945f8c refs/tags/v2.6.11
> > # c39ae07f393806ccf406ef966e9a15afc43cc36a refs/tags/v2.6.11^{}
>
> Is this correct? IOW is $refs{$hash} only used to give
> descriptive name given a 40-hexadecimal object name, and there
> is no requirement that you can give the descriptive name to
> rev-parse and get the object name back?
Ok, I admit it's a hack, but I've seen no other uses of the $refs
returned by git_get_references than being passed to format_ref_marker
which splits at the first / to see what to use as type and what to use
as name.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
