Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This re-roll of the v1[1] should hopefully address all the feedback on >> that version, particularly the motivation for the enum-as-bitfield >> labeling, as expanded on in 02/11. > > Other than [3] and [4] that I am not yet convinced is a good idea, > this round looks good to me. Not 3&4, but 4&5.
