Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
To me, the ability to say "HEAD@{35}" (or "HEAD@{650}"...) is not
fundamental,
Maybe it should?
Why? I'd have no idea where I'd end up. I can't remember exactly what I
did to my branch head more than 5 revs (or 15 minutes) ago, and since
the reflog provides "subject-by-action" instead of "subject-by-commit"
it's, imo, much less usable for recovering lost branch-heads.
Then, maybe you would be interested by 'git log -g' if 'git reflog'
isn't verbose enough for you.
Ah, now this is more like it. I should have known someone would have
come up with something clever like that :)
Had I only remembered the exact wording in the commit-subject I'd
have found it a lot faster with "git-lost-found | grep wording" than
I would have if I'd used the reflog from the start.
Maybe 'git log -g -Swording' then? Or any other log options you like.
*giggles* It works nicely with git-shortlog too.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
