Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I was leaning towards something like that plus a Documentation update, but > noticed that the current behaviour was inconsistent, and the confusion > pointed out by Junio seems to indicate it is better if fully restricted. That is a bad move, as existing repositories may have a ref with such a name. If we tighten anything retroactively, we probably should forgid '@' short-hand that stands for HEAD, I would think.
