Re: Should `@` be really a valid git tag name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Should `@` be really a valid git tag name?
From: Carlo Arenas <carenas@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:20:14 -0700
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0c68d628-e093-1cbd-e3bd-38a827545418@gmx.net>
References: <0c68d628-e093-1cbd-e3bd-38a827545418@gmx.net>

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:12 AM <gitmailinglist.bentolor@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A SO commenter pointed out, that git-check-ref-format forbids @ and
> maybe I should report this as a potential bug. Is it?

a reference that is named "@" only is invalid, but refs/tags/@ is not.

Carlo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should `@` be really a valid git tag name?
  - From: Junio C Hamano

References:
- Should `@` be really a valid git tag name?
  - From: gitmailinglist . bentolor

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] simple-ipc/ipc-win32: add Windows ACL to named pipe
Next by Date: Re: diff-index --cc no longer permitted, gitk is now broken (slightly)
Previous by thread: Should `@` be really a valid git tag name?
Next by thread: Re: Should `@` be really a valid git tag name?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux