Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: use fspathcmp() in path_hashmap_cmp()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:18:35PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Seeing as there seems to be some appetite for refactoring Git's code on
> this list, I am thinking that the `struct repository *r` direction might
> be the one to go for. And I mean like "move the globals into that struct"
> as opposed to introducing that stack you talked about. It would even be a
> refactoring where I would understand the motivation, and agree with it,
> too.

Oh, definitely. Regardless of whether step 2 is "pass around the
repository struct" or "treat the global repository struct as a stack",
step 1 must be putting repository-related globals into the struct. I
don't think there can be any solution that doesn't start with that. :)

And I think it can even be done incrementally with very little impact.
Just s/ignore_case/the_repository->ignore_case/ in the use-sites is an
improvement over the status quo. Even though it doesn't _fix_ anything,
now we can easily see where the dependencies on repo-variables are. And
of course follow-on steps to make sure we are passing around and
accessing the right repository struct are then welcome.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux