On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 08:22:25PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote: > > It however may not be a bad idea to catch these code paths where a > > local variable masks 'ignore_case' (and possibly other globals) and > > rename these local ones to avoid a mistake like this. > > The name itself is OK, I think, but using it at global scope is > confusing. -Wshadow can help find such cases, but not this one, as > test-hashmap.c doesn't include the global declaration. Moving the > global into a struct to provide a poor man's namespace would fix this > for all namesakes, assisted by the compiler. We'd then access it as > the_config.ignore_case or even the_config.core.ignore_case. > > Moving all config-related variables would be quite noisy, I guess, > and probably conflict with lots of in-flight patches, but might be > worth it. Really most of these ought to be in the repository struct anyway, I would think. The value of ignore_case comes from core.ignorecase, which is going to be repository-specific. We are probably doing the wrong thing already by looking at the parent core.ignorecase value when operating in an in-process submodule, but nobody noticed because it's quite unlikely for a submodule to have a different setting than the parent. -Peff