On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 12:23:57PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 08:38:55AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * tb/pack-finalize-ordering (2021-09-07) 2 commits > >> - builtin/repack.c: move `.idx` files into place last > >> - pack-write.c: rename `.idx` file into place last > >> > >> The order in which various files that make up a single (conceptual) > >> packfile has been reevaluated and straightened up. This matters in > >> correctness, as an incomplete set of files must not be shown to a > >> running Git. > >> > >> Will merge to 'next'? > > > > Ævar has a series [1] that complements this one nicely, so I would be > > happy to see them both queued. > > > > I had some suggestions inline, but I don't feel strongly about whether > > or not they are implemented. > > I hate to see multiple folks "competing" in the overlapping area, > each getting reviews and responding or not responding at their own > pace. That would force me to keep track of which one is which and > what their doneness are independently. > > Do you mind if I nominate you the team leader to come up with a > single series that is polished to be mergeable to 'next'? Not at all; sorry that I missed your email before submitting a v2 of the earlier series. Ævar seems to have combined them while I was eating dinner, but I'll coordinate with him and send out a unified result for you to queue up. Thanks, Taylor