Re: git-svn: Branching clarifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Kastrup wrote:
> Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> There's also a case if only branches and/or tags are specified, with
>> no trunk given.  That would need to be handled, somehow...
> 
> Just barf unless a --master=thisbranch option is given.  If you want
> to, you can allow multiple --track=remotebranch options as well,
> giving you a tracking branch for the specified remote branches under
> their original name.
> 
> Something like that.
> 

Just found your replies: my mail filter had lost them momentarily...

I agree with this: as it stands the current assignment of master when
using git-svn seems to break the principle of least surprise quite
badly. I think I'll just ignore the branch completely for the time being.

-- 

Russ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux