Re: git-svn: Branching clarifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Please.  git-svn is told how to find the trunk on its command line.
>> Nothing makes sense (short of an _explicit_ wish otherwise for
>> which it might make sense to create a command line option) than to
>> map master to the trunk.
>
> Keep in mind that command-line arguments for trunk, branches and tags
> are _all_ optional to git-svn.
>
> If only trunk or nothing is specified, the current behavior will
> always be correct.

Sure, since Subversion does not distinguish trunk, branches, tags, or
even projects from each other: they are just naming conventions in the
repository and nothing enforces them.  So if you check out a single,
named directory, it is natural that this will be master, and tracked.

> There's also a case if only branches and/or tags are specified, with
> no trunk given.  That would need to be handled, somehow...

Just barf unless a --master=thisbranch option is given.  If you want
to, you can allow multiple --track=remotebranch options as well,
giving you a tracking branch for the specified remote branches under
their original name.

Something like that.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux