Re: [PATCH 1/1] ci: new github-action for git-l10n code review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:49 AM Jean-Noël AVILA <jn.avila@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Le mardi 24 août 2021, 11:27:44 CEST Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> >
> > The biggest problem is that there are forks of `git-l10n/git-po` that
> > accept PRs in their own right. That is what I tried to address by using
> > just the repository name, without the org/user prefix.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Dscho
> >
>
> Well, I'm in this case, plus my repo is a fork of git/git.
>
> Would it not possible to formally require the presence of a "dumb" secret to run this rule?
>

It is not supported to use secrets/env in if condition. See this post:

    https://github.community/t/jobs-job-id-if-does-not-work-with-env-secrets/16928

In patch v3, will check both repo name and branch names. See:

    https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210827071320.14183-1-worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx/

--
Jiang Xin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux