On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 5:36 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > >> For a push event, it will scan commits one by one. If a commit does not > >> look like a l10n commit (no file in "po/" has been changed), it will > >> immediately fail without checking for further commits. While for a > >> pull_request event, all new introduced commits will be scanned. > >> > >> "git-po-helper" will generate two kinds of suggestions, errors and > >> warnings. A l10n contributor should try to fix all the errors, and > >> should pay attention to the warnings. All the errors and warnings will > >> be reported in the last step of the l10n workflow as two message groups. > >> For a pull_request event, will create additional comments in pull > >> request to report the result. > > > > It is a good idea to automate this. > > > > I am a bit concerned that the `ci-config` approach, even if we use it in > > the Git project itself, is quite cumbersome to use, though. So I hope that > > we can find an alternative solution. > > > > One such solution could be to make the `git-po-helper` job contingent on > > part of the repository name. For example: > > > > git-po-helper: > > if: endsWith(github.repository, '/git-po') > > [...] > > > > would skip the job unless the target repository's name is `git-po`. > > Nice. > > Can this be made into a matter purely local to git-l10n/git-po > repository and not git/git repository? I am wondering if we can ee > if the current repository is git-l10n/git-po or its fork and run it > only if that is true. I have read almost all the github documents on github actions, and tried to find if I can use a local branch, such as "github-action" to hold local github-actions, but no locky. That is to say, the workflow file must be introduced to the master branch of “git-l10n/git-po”. As "git-l10n/git-po" is a fork of "git/git", the new workflow should be part of "git/git", and provide a way to disable it by default. -- Jiang Xin
