On 26/08/2021 12:58, Carlo Arenas wrote:
I think you are correct, and from a flow point of view it should be reset there with the rest. Adding something to the commit message to explain it might help, and the documentation path I suggested (or something better) might be worth squashing to better explain why the last test case that resets in-reply-to headers is correct.
Squashing, you mean from your patch into mine? If that is what you mean, can you maybe do that and add SOB Peff for the other tests? It could just be one patch set really. If that is not what you mean, I will submit our (Peff's and my changes) patch as-is tomorrow.
Best regards, Marvin
Carlo
