Am 11.08.21 um 18:04 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> + * When writing or updating patterns, assume that the contents these >>> + * patterns are applied to are syntactically correct. You do not have >>> + * to implement all syntactical corner cases---the patterns have to be >>> + * sufficiently permissive. >>> + */ >> >> IMO, as written, the comment falls short of suggesting that patterns can >> be simple. How about appending "and can be simple"? > > The patterns can be simple without implementing all syntactical > corner cases, as long as they are sufficiently permissive. > > perhaps? Perfect! Thank you. -- Hannes
