Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> For example, 1e20a407 (stash list: stop passing "-m" to "git log", >> 2021-05-21) that dropped "-m" must be reverted as well, no? > > No, that change is fine. The "-m" doesn't have an effect one way or > another after this revert. Ah, we are saved by the fact that "--first-parent" was made to imply "-m", so a "-p" coming from the command line of "git stash list" would do "log --first-parent -p" that shows the patch we want without the need for "-m"... nice.