Re: strbuf new API, take 2 for inclusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:16:21PM +0000, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:15:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> 
> >   Yes, Junio already did that remark. The reason is that it's forward
> > compatible: if we ever change strbuf's intitial value for some reason,
> > we would just have to rebuild the code. As junio disliked it (and I'm
> > not sure I love it either) I've used it where using the _init() function
> > was impractical.
> 
> OK, I missed that discussion. Thanks for the explanation.

  That was on IRC, maybe that's the why :)

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpGBwtPqTBsY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux