Re: [PATCH 1/7] Rework strbuf API and semantics.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:44:42PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> >> Would not "struct strbuf sb = { 0 };" have the same effect?  (I am not so 
>> >> standards-keen as other people, who I have no doubt will gladly answer 
>> >> this one.)
>> >
>> > Yes, it would, according to the standard.
>> 
>> Have a citation for that?
>
> Of course.
>
> See ISO 9899:1999, section 6.7.8.
>
> Paragraph 10:
>
>   If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized
>   explicitly, its value is indeterminate. If an object that has static
>   storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then:
>
>   -- if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;

That's actually a new one to me.  I don't think that it has been
always the case in ANSI C.

Thanks.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux