Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:20:13PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: >> >>> I assume your tests are just done using the regular glibc allocator. I >>> also wondered how plugging in a better allocator might fare. Here are >>> timings I did of your mega-renames case with three binaries: one built >>> with USE_MEMORY_POOL set to 0, one with it set to 1, and one with it set >>> to 0 but adding "-ltcmalloc" to EXTLIBS via config.mak. >> >> Oh, btw, I wasn't able to apply your series from the list on top of >> en/ort-perf-batch-14 (there are some problems in patch 4, and "am -3" >> says my clone of git.git is missing some of the pre-image sha1s). I >> fetched ort-perf-batch-15 from https://github.com/newren/git and timed >> that, which I imagine is the same. But you may need to tweak the patches >> so that Junio can pick them up. > > Thanks, but the batch #15 has been in 'seen' since 23rd ;-) Oh, that is the previous round. I haven't had the chance to pick up this new round.
