Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Final optimization batch (#15): use memory pools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:20:13PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> I assume your tests are just done using the regular glibc allocator. I
>> also wondered how plugging in a better allocator might fare. Here are
>> timings I did of your mega-renames case with three binaries: one built
>> with USE_MEMORY_POOL set to 0, one with it set to 1, and one with it set
>> to 0 but adding "-ltcmalloc" to EXTLIBS via config.mak.
>
> Oh, btw, I wasn't able to apply your series from the list on top of
> en/ort-perf-batch-14 (there are some problems in patch 4, and "am -3"
> says my clone of git.git is missing some of the pre-image sha1s). I
> fetched ort-perf-batch-15 from https://github.com/newren/git and timed
> that, which I imagine is the same. But you may need to tweak the patches
> so that Junio can pick them up.

Thanks, but the batch #15 has been in 'seen' since 23rd ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux